The Rantings Of A Christian Conservative Gamer

The Right Spin

Human Nature - A Question
There's a divide within our nation. This isn't old news. However, as I was reading an article something the author stated made me think:

As the left-liberal root-causes rot has it, people are basically good. When and if they go astray, it's because someone caused them to. Crime is said to be precipitated by factors outside the perpetrator.

Can the differences between the left and right be summed up as simply as that? Can we say of the left and the right, "The left believes in mankind's basic goodness and acts accordingly and the right believes in mankind's basic badness and acts accordingly." The more I think about it the more I have to say, 'yes.' Ilana Mercer wrote an excellent article about this idea here.

When we look back at the tapestry of human history do we see the overwhelming progress of good or evil? If mankind is essentially good how do you explain the march of evil that is our past?

That's because, after people perpetrate evil, liberals toss free will to the wind... You see, to perpetrate evil, one must be "mentally ill."

If true how does the left explain the horrible evil of our past? Was everyone "mentally ill?" And why did this "illness" suddenly end in our age?

No human wants to think they're bad. We all want to believe we're doing what's right for ourselves and others. The problem with that thought, however, is the fact that most who commit evil don't believe it to be so. Crazy people don't think they're crazy


Oh, by the way, the first article linked has nothing to do with this topic but it's a good read anyway.
The Violence Within Islam
Islam and the Koran are built upon violence. Anyone who knows the history of the faith's founder knows this. Muhammad spoke only of peace when he was not in a position to take what he wanted. When his number swelled he had no problem bringing the sword to those who stood against him. There is simply no comparison between this man and the messiah of another faith, Yeshua.

That there are so many duped into believing Islam is a religion of peace while Christianity is a religion of intolerance astounds me yet is unsurprising. Anyone with the capacity to think and read can only conclude that Muslims who preach peace and tolerance are indeed infidels of the faith. The Koran is the literal word of Allah - unchanging and perfect in it's handing down. Therefore those who do not heed its call for the death of unbelievers (or at least their forced conversion at the sword) are not practicing true Islam. I suppose this could be blamed on the "corrupting" influence of the Judeo-Christian values that have formed the West.

It only goes to show how far the West has fallen when it extols the virtues of a barbaric faith while shunning the virtues of the faith without which they would not exist. Truly up has become down.
Revvin' Up For Iran
It would appear that Israel is confident in its ability to deal with Iran in March should it need to. I think that's great.

What I don't think is great is that the U.S. will probably take the lead in any action. All talks about action against Iran usually involves the words (or acronyms), "U.S.," "E.U." and "NATO." As if they're the only groups with opinions on the matter. Now, don't misunderstand me. I'm not calling for a "world consensus" on the matter. Far from it. But Israel, the most probable target for Iran's nukes next to the land of apple pie and white picket fences, certainly should be involved and, I daresay, take the lead.

Israel has made it clear she intends on launching an offensive against Iran regardless what the world community has to say about it. Not that to world community disagrees anyway. But with the idea of a U.S. led attack and the media denigrating Bush at every available moment I think perhaps the Administration should let Israel handle this one and simply provide intel and moral support. Cheerleaders if the situation really calls for it.

I think Bush needs to back off blowing stuff up for the time. I mean, I’d love to see the guy blow stuff up but if someone else is willing and able to go to the mat on this one we should let them.

But, perhaps, with the overall feeling that a nuclear Iran is a pretty bad idea it might be a good PR opportunity for the Administration. In that light I could see the U.S. leading this coalition of backstabbing cowards. Present company excluded (I'm lookin' at you England, Australia and Israel). The President could definitely use the poll boost and I'd like to see him get it. Just not at the expense of allowing Israel to show her strength. For when she does terrorists tend to back off. And that has even longer reaching positive consequences.
A Look Into Me...
This is something I wrote. I feel a bit weird putting it up but do what you will with it.