The Rantings Of A Christian Conservative Gamer

The Right Spin

NARC
So, Midway published a game called NARC in which you play a cop addicted to narcotics which you take in-game as a power-up. And CNN's got something to say about it.

What do I as a blue state Christian conservative think about this? I find it funny as all hell. I'm actually surprised that someone didn't think of this sooner! Do I think it's a good idea? Oh hell no. It's a terribly stupid idea. And not because I'm all for cencoring or anything like that, no. It's just a stupid game design choice and, I'm pretty sure, put in there to make the game seem "edgy". Yeah, it's getting all the bad publicity that Grand Theft Auto 3 did, but that game didn't suck. NARC does.

Additionally, this game is intended for adult gamers - 17+. Says so right on the box. So, if you're gonna get uppity about this then you need to get uppity about ever rated "R" movie ever released. Just because it happens to be a video game doesn't mean it's being targeted at kids. How many kids do you know who can shell out $200 for a console and $50 for a game? I daresay not many. And even if you do I'm sure they have parents. Bottom line, parents should be monitoring this stuff. If you won't let Timmy rent an "R" rated flick from Blockbuster then you should probably make sure he doesn't have this game either. And not just because of the drug content or the "M" rating. The game really sucks. Don't support this tripe.

Now, excuse me as I go kill a hooker in an alley by draining her blood as my scantily clad crazy vampire cheerleader in Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines. It's rated "M" and I'm over 17 so I get to play it, go me!
Posted by Kevin D. on Thursday May 5, 2005 at 6:40pm
Lusipher (mail):
Having actually played Narc, I thought I'd throw my few comments into the ring. The game actually isn't half bad. You're a cop whose basically out of control (ala Deep Cover, Training Day, or any other cop film starring a good looking african american male in the lead.) whose succumb to the evils he faces daily. That classic (used all too often) Nietzsche quote immediately springs to mind. "He who might take lest he thereby become a monster." Which in itself is a strong premise used in various ways throughout many different games (Vagrant Story, Devil May Cry, even th e vaunted Metal Gear Solid 3). The visuals are pretty crisp and graphically equivalent to most games on the market currently, the soundtrack rules, it has voice overs that haven't been used to this startling effect since the aforementioned GTA3 (Grand Theft Auto for the unintiated), but the actual controls are subpar and the profanity is gratuitous (and that's being kind). But theb thing that rocks (and perplexes) me the most is the actually price strategy on the game. Which might lead one to thinking in whose hot little hands was this intended to go. In a move very similar to what Sega and ESPN did a couple of months ago with they're football title vs. the console football giant known only to fans as "Madden". Midway released the title for $19.99. And what screams buy me to an under 17 year old kid more than less than 20 bucks. Hell CD's cost 75% of that, but they're not buying those so my point there is invalid.

I've also been on the otherside of the counter too. Peddling all sorts of violence to the "tweener" set, and I'd have to say about 3 out of 10 parents actually come in the store with their children to make a purchase. What's more shocking is that only 1 of those parents will actually even know what an "M" rating on a game is. Or even care. It makes me wonder why parents worked so hard to lobby for a system to be put in place that they obviously don't acknowledge. It saddens me to think that alot of parents ultimately think it's America's duty to parent their children, and when we do they get angry and file lawsuits.

You can't have it both ways America.
5.6.2005 10:05pm
Kevin D. (mail) (www):
Heh, I remember the story of a kid who told his mom that "M" stood for medium. She's was mildly upset when she learned the truth.
5.7.2005 1:08am
AngelLover (mail):
Lusipher, you are 100% right. The point you make about so many parents refusing to take resposibility for the upbringing of their children relates directly to earlier posts concerning public education.
5.7.2005 11:42pm